贺梅姐弟妹昨天回国了--有人又跳得太早了哈

crasher

balto 发表于 2011-8-18 13:50
90兄这个话题就此打住吧，贺绍强真的不是什么好鸟，岳东晓也一样不咋滴（偷偷的说一下哈）。。。

哈哈，岳东晓很郁闷，自己的官司没头绪，以前的陈年烂帐又被人拿出来翻吵不休。

balto

Jinan90 发表于 2011-8-18 13:56
这个嘛。

官司之后的发展压根不能否定打官司要回女儿的正确。他们现在也过得挺好。

我不是说判决书有啥问题，父母权是毫无疑问的，我说贺绍强不是什么好鸟是说没必要为他多费口水，呵呵。。。

Jinan90

balto 发表于 2011-8-18 15:41
我不是说判决书有啥问题，父母权是毫无疑问的，我说贺绍强不是什么好鸟是说没必要为他多费口水，呵呵。。 ...

现在孩子们归罗琴。

balto

Jinan90 发表于 2011-8-18 14:43
现在孩子们归罗琴。

是啊，贺梅过来玩一趟然后回到罗琴身边故事不是挺圆满的么，story is over。。。有必要这么激动的上下庆祝么？

ppteam

this is weird case.
"According to the Hes, it was a temporary arrangement so that Anna Mae could have health insurance. According to the Bakers, both families had agreed that the Bakers would raise Anna Mae through adolescence."

so the key is that consent order. It should be clear, otherwise people who prepared this sucks.

crasher

判决书上关于转让监护权一事的详细陈情:

On June 2, 1999, the father of A.M.H., the Bakers, the Mid-South counselor, and Mid-South’s attorney met to explain to the father the legal effect of granting the Bakers temporary custody. According to Mrs. Baker’s testimony, the father was told by the attorney “that this could go for one year or it could go for 18 years.” Mid-South’s attorney testified that he informed the parents that by giving up custody, “unless everybody consents to give the custody back . . . anybody that gives up even temporary custody takes a risk that . . . the court may not give custody back.” He further testified:

And I’m sure I would have given some hypotheticals about what some of those reasons [for not returning custody to the parents] might be; you know, that if the couple that wanted custody back [engaged in] drug use or alcohol use or some kind of abuse or not having a place for the child to live or not – you know, those sort of things could prevent you from getting custody back.

On June 4, 1999, Mid-South’s attorney went with the Bakers and the parents of A.M.H. to the Juvenile Court of Shelby County to obtain a consent order transferring custody of A.M.H. to the Bakers. A juvenile court officer drafted the “Petition for Custody” and a “Consent Order Awarding Custody.” The consent order does not mention child support or visitation. A juvenile court interpreter, the juvenile court officer, and Mid-South’s attorney spoke with the mother privately before she signed the order; the mother was told that the order would enable the Bakers to obtain health insurance for A.M.H. The juvenile court officer who drafted the consent order testified that the mother was very concerned that the arrangement be temporary and that the parents would continue to have “open visitation” with A.M.H. through the duration of the Bakers’ custody.

Despite the mother’s concerns that the arrangement be temporary, the juvenile court officer added a guardianship provision to the consent order so that the Bakers could obtain medical insurance for A.M.H. Mrs. Baker stated that there was no discussion of guardianship during the meeting between the Bakers and the parents of A.M.H. prior to the execution of the consent order
in juvenile court.

http://www.parentalrightsandjust ... ite/1/19/AMHOPN.pdf

Jinan90

ppteam 发表于 2011-8-18 15:58
this is weird case.
"According to the Hes, it was a temporary arrangement so that Anna Mae could ha ...

贝克好像是签过无数合同的地产人员， 肯定清楚书面合同的必要性。

结果却没有， 可以推测当初就没人让他带孩子到18岁。


孩子跟一家生活到18岁，即使另有亲爹妈也不会认了。 没有人会认为让自己孩子送人18年是占便宜， 除非他们对着孩子是除之而后快。