The following is quoted from Yahoo Finance. Can anyone explain why leveraged ETFs get widening gap with the index, by using plain, everyday language? Thanks.
Mind the Gap: The Problem with Leveraged ETFs
Posted Aug 14, 2009 09:30am EDT by Aaron Task in Investing
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney is joining UBS in potentially suspending sales of leveraged ETFs to its retail clients, while Charles Schwab advises investors to "proceed with extreme caution," Dow Jones reports.
The brokers are responding to pressure from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), which in June raised questions about the suitability of leveraged ETFs for investors who plan to hold them for more than one trading day.
The big problem with leveraged ETFs is while they may be able to mimic a particular index for one or two days, "as soon as you start looking at longer time periods, you get this ever widening gap between of the index and the ETF," says Tom Lauricella, a Wall Street Journal reporter and author of the Fund Fiend column. "The crucial thing about the math behind these things, is when you get big up and down moves, the gaps get wider and wider."
As a result of these performance gaps, some "bear" ETFs actually lost money during 2008 even as the broad market tanked, Lauricella notes, meaning investors who thought they were hedged against a decline still lost money.
For example, the UltraShort S&P 500 ProShares Fund (SDS), which seeks to provide two times the inverse performance of the S&P 500, is down more than 30% in the past year, worse than the S&P's 21% drop in the same time period.
As with any investment, make sure you know what you're getting into when you buy an ETF -- more especially if it's leveraged. |