找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 944|回复: 5

今天看到的很好的一个采访中的一段,非常好...

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-6-10 04:58 PM | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式


本帖最后由 X!nG 于 2009-6-10 18:07 编辑

"If the Fed examiners were set upon the Fed's own documents—unlabeled documents—to pass judgment on the Fed's capacity to survive the difficulties it faces in credit, it would shut this institution down," he said. "The Fed is undercapitalized in a way that Citicorp is undercapitalized."
By Jim Grant
发表于 2009-6-10 05:03 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-10 05:14 PM | 显示全部楼层
If in theory Fed can print unlimited paper money, why would they be undercapitalized?
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-10 05:32 PM | 显示全部楼层
If in theory Fed can print unlimited paper money, why would they be undercapitalized?
dara 发表于 2009-6-10 18:14



问题的实质是Fed不可以。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-10 05:37 PM | 显示全部楼层
"If the Fed examiners were set upon the Fed's own documents—unlabeled documents—to pass judgment on the Fed's capacity to survive the difficulties it faces in credit, it would shut this institution  ...
X!nG 发表于 2009-6-10 17:58


这个大家早就知道了. 江湖传说, 下一个破产的大银行应该是FED, 如果只看BALANCE SHEET的话
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-10 10:22 PM | 显示全部楼层
why not
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|小黑屋|www.hutong9.net

GMT-5, 2025-3-4 03:35 PM , Processed in 0.043053 second(s), 14 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表