找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 428|回复: 0

[报告] CMHC关于延还贷款的最新报告

[复制链接]
发表于 2020-12-16 09:18 PM | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式


本帖最后由 deep 于 2020-12-16 09:29 PM 编辑

Mortgage Deferral Agreements and Their Impact
December 16, 2020


Our Fall 2020 Residential Mortgage Industry Dashboard discusses mortgage deferral agreements and their impact.

At the end of the second quarter1, credit unions, mortgage finance companies (MFCs) and mortgage investment entities (MIEs) have allowed mortgage deferral agreements for about 6%, 7% and 7% of their respective residential mortgage portfolios.

Chartered banks have allowed 16% of mortgages to go into deferral since the beginning of the pandemic. Of these, close to 2 out of 3 borrowers had resumed payments on their mortgages at the end of the third quarter of 20202. In the coming months, we could see higher delinquency rates if some borrowers are unable to resume their payments; these mortgages will have to be booked as arrears.

These deferral agreements have affected financial institutions’ cash flows, with reductions of:

  • 4% in scheduled mortgage payments
  • 3% in non-scheduled payments (accelerated monthly payments and lump-sum payments)
Cash flows from both scheduled and non-scheduled capital repayments are reduced as mortgage deferral agreements are in place [td]

Repayment of principal — scheduled periodic payments
Repayment of principal — non-scheduled payments
April to September 2020
28
16
April to September 2019
29
16

Sources: CMHC, residential mortgage data reporting of NHA MBS issuers, CMHC calculations

While remaining at low levels, mortgages in arrears (90 or more days delinquent) have increased slightly between the first and second quarters of 2020 from:

  • 0.24% to 0.26%, on average, for chartered banks
  • 0.23% to 0.25%, on average, for non-bank mortgage lenders3

We also observe an increase in early-stage delinquencies (31 to 59 days and 60 to 89 days), which suggests that arrears could continue on an upward trend.

Mortgage in arrears (delinquent for 90 days and over) have increased for all lender types [td]

2020 Q1
2020 Q2
Chartered Banks
0.24%
0.26%
Credit Unions
0.16%
0.18%
MFCs
0.21%
0.23%
MIEs
1.73%
1.85%

Sources: Statistics Canada (Survey of Non-Bank Mortgage Lenders, second quarter 2020) and Canadian Bankers Association (Number of Residential Mortgages in Arrears, May 2020)

From January to October 2020, chartered banks reported a more than 20% increase in the total value of mortgage originations attributed to Canadian residents compared to the same period in 2019. This is mainly due to a surge in newly extended mortgages, both for property purchases and refinances. Lower interest rates, coupled with significant increases in housing prices in some Canadian markets, partially explain the increase in mortgage originations, in both numbers and value.

Banks have reported increasing mortgage activity, mostly due to new mortgages for property purchases and refinances [td]

2019 YTD
2020 YTD
January to September 2019
January to September 2020
Mortgage originations for the purchases of property — Insured
28,704,856
38,880,068
28.70
38.88
Mortgage originations for the purchases of property — Uninsured
70,856,433
84,158,548
70.86
84.16
Same lender refinancing — Insured
2,101,973
2,175,313
2.10
2.18
Same lender refinancing — Uninsured
49,665,253
59,637,211
49.67
59.64
Same lender renewals — Insured
60,641,936
77,612,189
60.64
77.61
Same lender renewals — Uninsured
78,525,165
92,602,677
78.53
92.60
Other renewals/refinancing and other mortgages — Insured
2,404,434
3,200,294
2.40
3.20
Other renewals/refinancing and other mortgages — Uninsured
17,825,299
21,519,737
17.83
21.52

Sources: CMHC, residential mortgage data reporting of NHA MBS issuers, CMHC calculations

By contrast, limited mortgage issuances by the largest mortgage investment corporations in Canada during the second quarter of 2020 have resulted in slower growth from this segment:

  • mortgage investment corporation (0.9%)
  • overall residential mortgage growth in Canada (1.3%)

The risk profile of loans issued by MICs remains relatively stable, with an average loan-to-value (LTV) ratio under 70% and around 75% being first mortgages. Interviews with a sample of MIC managers suggest mortgage investment corporations have adopted more restrictive lending, indicating a focus on capital preservation.

Key metrics of top 25 MICs in Canada have remained relatively stable[td]

Q2-2019
Q3-2019
Q4-2019
Q1-2020
Q2-2020
Average Lending rate — Individuals
9.2%
9.25%
9.28%
9.14%
9.31%
Average Share of 1st mortgages — Individuals
74.53%
74.57%
73.43%
75.15%
75.48%
Average Loan-To-Value (LTV ratio) — Individuals
57.93%
56.43%
56.47%
56.65%
56.68%
Debt to Capital
17.23%
15.90%
15.70%
14.80%
14.39%

Geographical distribution[td]

Q2-2019
Q3-2019
Q4-2019
Q1-2020
Q2-2020
BC
37.4%
33.15%
34.74%
36.23%
36.24%
Alberta
9.45%
11.17%
9.75%
7.66%
8.18%
Ontario
46.46%
49.40%
49.18%
49.54%
48.47%
Quebec
1.97%
2.10%
2.14%
Others
6.76%
6.3%
4.34%
4.48%
4.57%

Source: Fundamentals Research Corp.

评分

1

查看全部评分

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|小黑屋|www.hutong9.net

GMT-5, 2024-4-20 06:19 AM , Processed in 0.043807 second(s), 18 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表