找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 1581|回复: 5

[放炮] EDU浑水一潭

[复制链接]
发表于 2012-10-2 01:13 PM | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式


本帖最后由 maybeapril 于 2012-10-2 01:20 PM 编辑

仔细读,昨天EDU自己发布的报告似乎很模糊: “no significant evidence”隐约还是有证据的。The Company does have ownership, full or partial ownership?  
========================
“‪The Special Committee’s work on the “franchise” issue uncovered no significant evidence that supports the Muddy Waters allegation mentioned above.  The evidence collected indicates that the Company does have ownership interests in its 55 schools and associated learning centers.  The activity related to the 21 third parties with whom New Oriental has entered into brand “cooperation agreements” is entirely separate, is immaterial, and in any event is properly accounted for in the Company’s financial statements. The Special Committee’s work on the tax issue uncovered no significant evidence that supports the Muddy Waters allegation mentioned above.”
=========================
如果浑水他们手里还有重料未曝光,那浑水肯定不会善罢甘休 (Muddy Waters ‘Convinced’ New Oriental Misleading Investors),那EDU就有被打到新低的危险。

评分

2

查看全部评分

发表于 2012-10-2 01:35 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-10-2 01:40 PM | 显示全部楼层
有那家公司真的一点问题都没有的。浑水就是拿住这点了。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-10-2 03:37 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-10-2 08:26 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-3 09:54 AM | 显示全部楼层
Two big questions behind the statement:
1) What does it mean by "no significant evidence"?
2) How much does the Company have ownership interests in its 55 schools and associated learning centers?

Read it by yourself:

The company says: ”‪The Special Committee’s work on the “franchise” issue uncovered no significant evidence that supports the Muddy Waters allegation mentioned above. The evidence collected indicates that the Company does have ownership interests in its 55 schools and associated learning centers. The activity related to the 21 third parties with whom New Oriental has entered into brand “cooperation agreements” is entirely separate, is immaterial, and in any event is properly accounted for in the Company’s financial statements. The Special Committee’s work on the tax issue uncovered no significant evidence that supports the Muddy Waters allegation mentioned above.”
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|小黑屋|www.hutong9.net

GMT-5, 2024-3-29 10:01 AM , Processed in 0.043268 second(s), 15 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表