找回密码
 注册
搜索
楼主: Cobra

[技术分析] 12/14/2010 大盘回顾 (Hindenburg Omen)

   火.. [复制链接]
发表于 2010-12-14 09:27 PM | 显示全部楼层


顶顶顶!!!
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 09:28 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-14 09:29 PM | 显示全部楼层
Hindenburg Omen is not as useful as one might think. I pointed out in the daily watering thread that ...
csw2002 发表于 2010-12-14 21:14



    那你有没有统计过以前Hindenburg Omen工作的时候是不是不是因为bond ETF创新低的多呢?我觉得哈,既然是TA,信号触发了,就是触发了,别想着,这次是因为啥原因,所以可能不工作,如果你总那么想,那么TA信号基本就没什么用。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 09:39 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 09:45 PM | 显示全部楼层
"Hindenburg Omen"这次要是真的触发的话, 那可不得了哇, 会跌得"血流成河"的, 5555, 我还有一些UAL和LCC还没来得及出来, 班长帮看看它们大概会跌到哪里才能止跌呀, 谢谢!
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 09:45 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 43# Cobra

Back in Aug., I said super bear's problem was the bonds' low yield. Now, at least this one is gone with wind. Can't wait SPX shoot to 14XX without any >5% pull back. Go, bulls.
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 09:52 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 09:57 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复  Cobra

Back in Aug., I said super bear's problem was the bonds' low yield. Now, at least th ...
colderdown 发表于 2010-12-14 21:45



冷兄你真打算一直做空到14xx吗?
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 10:00 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 10:04 PM | 显示全部楼层
Thanks
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 10:06 PM | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 summer123 于 2010-12-14 22:07 编辑

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindenburg_Omen

Recent occurrences

    * August 12, 2010: The Omen's creator, Jim Miekka, considered the Omen officially triggered on this date with 92 and 81 new 52-week highs and lows, respectively. The McClellan Oscillator was a negative -120.03 and the 10-week NYSE moving average was rising; the market closed above its open of 50 days prior (May 27). [5]. In the ensuing week, the Omen narrowly missed confirmation twice (August 13 and 19).

    * August 20, 2010: According to the Wall Street Journal, the omen was confirmed on Friday, with 83 new 52-week highs and 95 new 52-week lows on the NYSE. The McClellan Oscillator was a negative -106.46 and the 10-week NYSE moving average was rising; the market closed above its open of 50 days prior (June 11). [6]

    * August 24, 2010: 166 New Lows, 87 new Highs, McClellan Oscillator was negative, but the 10 week average began to fall. (Non-Confirmation.) (Although the 12 week average is still positive.)

    * August 25, 2010: 150 New Lows, 90 new Highs, McClellan Oscillator was negative, but again the 10 week average was falling (Non-Confirmation.) (Although the 12 week average is still positive.)

    * August 31, 2010: 86 New Lows, 164 new Highs, McClellan Oscillator was negative, and the 10 week moving average was up slightly 8.86 (0.13%) but falling (non-confirmation)

    * December 14, 2010: 113 New Lows, 179 New Highs, 3063 Advancers+Decliners, McClellan Oscillator was negative (-5.36), NYSE Composite Index closed at 7855.22 vs 7272.53 50 trading days prior (October 4, 2010), and the 10 week moving average was rising.

评分

1

查看全部评分

回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 10:11 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 10:11 PM | 显示全部楼层
3x
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 10:12 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 10:13 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 1# Cobra


   
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 10:16 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 10:17 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 10:21 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 48# littlevivi

Come on, this like what I siad back in Aug, "I wish TLT go to 120". the odds is low. But from trader's mentality point of view, I do prepared to be squeezed to 14XX without filling the "tax cut" gap 1st.
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 10:21 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-12-14 10:38 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|小黑屋|www.hutong9.net

GMT-5, 2024-5-19 11:18 AM , Processed in 0.152139 second(s), 15 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表