|
发表于 2009-3-1 09:21 PM
|
显示全部楼层
119# spy2009
Kind of surprise to learn that though, so I Just had a close look at WX website. The scientific management team is very strong, consists of tens of Ph.Ds. Most of them have degree from States, and working experience in big pharm.
The company has ~3,800 employee, a pretty decent size for a pharma.
Since I could not visit the company in person, here is some info I decoded from WX website.
1) Majority of the directors have Ph.D in organic chemistry, making me feel that WX focuses more on providing R&D service (more in drug discovery stage) for small molecule synthesis, ADME study, analytical service etc. Their business strategy is to be a contract research organization (CRO). The R&D contract that WX signed with Pfizer, explained why Pfizer laid off hundreds scientists (if I recalled right) recently.
2) It also implies that their biological related service is not as strong as small molecule based service, this hypothesis was confirmed by lacking of typical biophysical instruments (CD, DLS) for biomolecule formulation from the list of instrument on their website. Well, for CRO of biomolecule, they may not need. The website is well-designed in a way to fool people who don't know the area, making them think WX is strong in all areas.
I am not familiar with CRO business, I don't know how profitable it might be. However, I am very familiar with Contract Manufacturing Organization (CMO) business, and the big bucks or profit is from commercial manufacturing, not from producing drugs for clinical trials. I am not sure if WX has signed any contract for commercial manufacturing. that's where big bucks come from.
CRO or CMO is more recession proof than big pharm, as the business strategy for big pharm during recession is to outsourcing.
Just my 2 cents, feel free to correct me if I am wrong. |
|