TA探讨

jsl

20# lite1067


其实很多细节是不一样的。比如说近期高点的相对位置

jsl

补充一句，超买的回调俺不叫做熊，但是因该Hedge.

流动的建筑

Market internals (accumulation/distribution) are different.

The market doesn't know, and doesn't care, which MAs each chartist chooses to draw his charts.

lite1067

20# lite1067


其实很多细节是不一样的。比如说近期高点的相对位置
jsl 发表于 2009-7-17 00:09

细节很难完全一样吧。。anyhow.... i added the full chart in the original post.. take a look.

jsl

24# lite1067


那一点点的不同其实是可以导致不同的符号的，以及周围的环境是很重要的。Anyhow, it is important to hedge here as I said earlier today. The future developement is crucial here.

louieca

QuickHand

JM2C:
big difference:
history is under 200MA, today is above 200MA,
this difference has changed the market psychology.

QuickHand

这可能就是"万事具备, 只等开棰"变成了, "没等开棰, 捶子快费"...

Stein

短期(1 ~2 week）内跌是肯定的，但何时是止高点?

CoolMax

新旧图的区别：新图200ma在下面；旧图200ma在上面。
Anita 发表于 2009-7-17 12:47 AM

Yes. Very important difference。

CoolMax

lite, 绿线200ma, 红线50，蓝线20？
刺穿BB上沿这么多，短期应该回调，回调之后怎么走，我不是老大，不知道
Anita 发表于 2009-7-17 12:44 AM

BB已经开口了，一种可能就是贴着BB上轨走。

bear!

great charts

大牛Steve

好图，比较是技术分析的一个重要手段。
亚洲的牛市会不会倒过来影响美国的市场，环境在起变化。

dara

thanks for the hard work, it is nice to look at the chart.

BTW,  in Oct. 2002 we see SPX in 768? why I did not see that?

I read the chart wrong?

CoolMax

thanks for the hard work, it is nice to look at the chart.

BTW,  in Oct. 2002 we see SPX in 768? why I did not see that?

I read the chart wrong?
dara 发表于 2009-7-17 07:34 PM

That's right， that's why people thought is would be a bottom around 770 Feb. this year.

coexist

wait and see

Lionking

12# Anita

That's big one. Old chart is way below 200ma, but now we sit easily above it.

china_wei

把今天7月17号和今年2月9号作类比，具有更大相似性，让我们拭目以待

大牛Steve

Yes. Very important difference。
CoolMax 发表于 2009-7-17 18:05

可否在此请教CoolMax老大：
用Exponential MA200， S&P500被紧紧压着。
而用Simple MA200，股价的Bar Chart却踩在上面。
用EMA还是SMA来解读图表比较客观？
先致谢意。