对印＄与基本面就发生重大变化的不同声音

wxw

印钱＄，钱多了，不可否认有助股市上涨，毕竟股市的上涨是拿钱堆出来的。
说印钱＄了，基本面发生重大变化值得商榷。
为什么？俺的理解是不得已而为之。确切地说现有的钱不够用了或解决不了问题，需要更多。。。
如果印钱能解决问题，１T不够，２T，５T，１０T，更多，或者说需要多少印多少？这里决不是抬杠,答案是否定的。

本轮股市上涨是在跌到３０年均线附近，技术上有反弹的要求，任何利好都可能刺激股市反弹，印＄是利好之一。俺不认为是什么基本面的重大改变，只是找个炒做理由而已。如果有一天跌到印＄前的水平，我们还说什么？

O８政府登基１００日没看出其拿出什么新的产业政策和改善经济的方法，也就是头痛医头，脚疼治脚。经济下滑趋势还没有止住，大牛市翻转俺看还需要时间A。毕竟经济宏观面才是股市的基础。

colderdown

If some one tell you 印钱 means a bull market, you shall tell him to read economy 101 first. It appears saying "inflation" is very popular these days. In fact, there is NO FCUKING inflation now and in the mid future.

focusonsth

Ding  

coexist

TA, FA 还是MA吧

johndai

xie

小亥

About 7% the stimulus package is applied to the real tangible industry. Most of the money is used to 补窟窿。Comparing the total size of the U.S. economy, it's really nothing. So it has a joke name as "Stimulus".  Big banks know even if they are not going to go bankrupt, they  are not going to go out and lend. Because, now it is a survival game.  Only the survivor gets the chance of splitting a bigger piece of pie. See what GS got after all those competitors are gone? So talking about bull market now is really totally bullsh*t. 余下的就看银熊的贴好了。

http://www.hutong9.com/viewthread.php?tid=46075&extra=page%3D1

wowo

不同的声音是对的,但背后的道理没说出来,