找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 3138|回复: 18

Book [Practical Speculation]

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-4-2 08:36 PM | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式


Practical Speculation (Hardcover)by Victor Niederhoffer (Author), Laurel Kenner (Author) "His words, taken alone, do not seem too foreboding..."

Review
". . . the best trading book of the young millenium. . . offers more trading 'truth' than a dozen typical market books combined. It's in a league of it's own." (Active Trader magazine)
At last, some modest proof of what some of us have long suspected - beware of lords on boards. Authors Victor Niederhoffer and Laurel Kenner* studied the relationship between stock returns and the number of board members with titles in the 50 largest companies by market value in the FTSE 100. Over a five year period, the more titles on the board, the worse the performance of the shares.
Niederhoffer and Kenner even invented a valuation indicator, the earnings/lords ratio, dividing the earnings per share by the number of titles in the boardroom. At the time they did the study, Powergen, with just one lord, looked the most attractive stock on this basis.
The finding raises the obvious question of causality. As the authors write: "Was it the lords who caused the lackluster performance or the lackluster performance that prompted the companies to use lords as window-dressing?"
That comment, however, suggests a possible American misunderstanding of the British honors system. The presence of titles on UK boards does not simply indicate the lingering influence of the ancient British aristocracy. Charities may still want to recruit Lord Ponsonby-Snodgrass just to make the notepaper look respectable; boards of FTSE 100 companies don't really need to do so.
Instead, the preponderance of titles shows the tendency for the honours system to reward people for business success. Rise to the top of a FTSE 100 company and you can be pretty sure a gong is heading your way, especially if you have the foresight to make some political donations.
The "lords on boards" effect may thus be merely another indication of the old rule of "reversion to the mean". Executives get awarded titles when profits are strong and the share price is rising, not in the aftermath of profit warnings and failed acquisitions. Since all companies eventually suffer some sort of bad news, the disasters are more likely to occur after the honours are awarded. When the queen brings the sword down on an executive's shoulder, the blade of Damocles may not be far behind it. *Practical Speculation, published by John Wiley & Sons (The Financial Times, June 4, 2003) "...At last, some modest proof of what some of us have long suspected - beware of lords on boards..." (Financial Times, 3 June 2003) "...will enable the investor to make independent decisions about their investments with confidence..." (Portfolio International, June 2003) "...shows how far pension fund figures are out of line with long -term share market expectation..." (Liverpool Daily Post, 6 August 2003) "Niederhoffer and Kenner dispense pearls of wisdom for both the seasoned professional and the novice about investing and much more. Though you may not agree with all that they write – I can’t imagine anyone would – they will compel you to think and very often, cause you to smile." --Mark P. Kritzman I consider Victor Neiderhoffer's highly entertaining Practical Speculation to be a modern classic. In Practical Speculation, Neiderhoffer explores a wide range of fascinating topics ranging from the wisdom of value investing to the implications of a company slapping its name on a shiny new stadium. - Street.com

"... the best trading book of the young millenium... offers more trading 'truth' than a dozen typical market books combined. It's in a league of it's own." (Active Trader magazine) "...At last, some modest proof of what some of us have long suspected - beware of lords on boards..." (Financial Times, 3 June 2003) "...will enable the investor to make independent decisions about their investments with confidence..." (Portfolio International, June 2003) "...shows how far pension fund figures are out of line with long -term share market expectation..." (Liverpool Daily Post, 6 August 2003)

"...At last, some modest proof of what some of us have long suspected - beware of lords on boards..." -- Financial Times, 3 June 2003

"...shows how far pension fund figures are out of line with long -term share market expectation..." -- Liverpool Daily Post, 6 August 2003

"...will enable the investor to make independent decisions about their investments with confidence..." -- Portfolio International, June 2003

Review
"Niederhoffer and Kenner dispense pearls of wisdom for both the seasoned professional and the novice about investing and much more. Though you may not agree with all that they write – I can’t imagine anyone would – they will compel you to think and very often, cause you to smile." --Mark P. Kritzman


游客,本帖隐藏的内容需要积分高于 20 才可浏览,您当前积分为 0
发表于 2009-4-2 08:53 PM | 显示全部楼层
thanks a lot
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-2 09:21 PM | 显示全部楼层
Re
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-2 10:24 PM | 显示全部楼层
thanks
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-2 11:26 PM | 显示全部楼层
Want to have a look
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-2 11:26 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-2 11:27 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-2 11:27 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-2 11:27 PM | 显示全部楼层

finally 20
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-8 05:38 PM | 显示全部楼层
可惜我还是看不到。积分不够。
等我以后积分到了再下吧。先谢谢楼主分享了
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-8 05:40 PM | 显示全部楼层
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-18 01:59 PM | 显示全部楼层
Ding!
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-9-7 07:30 AM | 显示全部楼层
谢谢
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-10-4 06:45 PM | 显示全部楼层
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-4-2 05:53 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-4-20 02:41 AM | 显示全部楼层
have a look
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-5-31 08:33 AM | 显示全部楼层
thanks a lot
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-6-27 06:35 PM | 显示全部楼层
Thanks! Will have a look.
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2011-3-6 05:38 PM | 显示全部楼层
thanks
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|小黑屋|www.hutong9.net

GMT-5, 2024-9-27 03:42 PM , Processed in 0.044088 second(s), 18 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表