找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 2266|回复: 25

[技术分析] 一个Leading Dianogal的存在

[复制链接]
发表于 2010-7-24 08:04 PM | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式


本帖最后由 大牛Steve 于 2010-7-24 22:13 编辑

这是6月26日星大对标普500的数浪
星大数浪.PNG
这是一个月后标普500的走势

S&P500.PNG
由此可见,一个Leading Dianogal的确有存在的可能。
标普500的目标1145。
就是说:四浪居然冲进一浪区。
感谢星大!

评分

3

查看全部评分

发表于 2010-7-24 08:17 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-24 08:20 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-24 08:25 PM | 显示全部楼层
这是6月26日星大对标普500的数浪

这是一个月后标普500的走势


由此可见,一个Leading Dianogal的确有 ...
大牛Steve 发表于 2010-7-24 22:04



    星大应改称星牛!
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-24 08:39 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-24 09:42 PM | 显示全部楼层
Thanks..
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-24 09:46 PM | 显示全部楼层
应该叫牛郎星,胡同赶快造神运动!
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-24 09:57 PM | 显示全部楼层
"Panic Phase: 2007-20??"
Is the Market's Panic Phase Over? If Not, When?


What phase of the stock market are we in? Let's consider a few facts.

The all-time high for the Dow Jones Industrials is 14,164 (October 2007). Then the trend changed. By the time the index hit the March 2009 low of 6547, stock portfolios were devastated and investor fear was pervasive. It felt like there was no market bottom in sight. The collapse was rightly described as the worst since 1929.

The comparison to 1929 is instructive. In that year, the Dow reached a September high of 381.17. After the October Crash, prices actually rallied into early 1930. But then came the second leg down, which was worse than the first: All told -- from the 1929 high to the low of 41.22 on July 8, 1932 -- the Dow lost 89%. This was panic on an epic scale.

Fast forward to the recent past: You know the market rallied from the March 2009 low to 11,205 on April 26, 2010. Since then the market has started to take back some of those gains.

So: Have we started a "second leg down," which will be worse than the 2007-2009 crash? Could it be like (or worse than) the market of the early 1930s?

The answer depends on investor psychology -- specifically, how long investors were in an "exuberant" phase before the trend changed from "bull" to "bear." Here again, we can compare today with the 1929-1932 period.

Investor exuberance from 1921-1929 was so great that we call that decade the "Roaring Twenties." In turn, recent decades -- 1974-2007 -- make it clear that investor exuberance was about four times longer compared to the 'twenties!


The extended exuberance of 1974-2007 points toward a "panic phase" to follow, which could last longer than the 1929-1933 "panic phase."

panic

panic
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-24 11:30 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-24 11:49 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-24 11:55 PM | 显示全部楼层
"四浪居然冲进一浪区"是违反了WAVE论最基本的理论之一。
就这次是例外吗?
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-25 12:14 AM | 显示全部楼层
回复 11# ppteam
以下是星大有关这一点的解说,是因为太过重要了,才值得特别关注。
http://www.hutong9.net/viewthrea ... &extra=page%3D9
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-25 12:33 AM | 显示全部楼层
回复 12# 大牛Steve

interesting.
btw, for the label on 1200, to me the advance is clearly 5 waves. So the worst case is 5-3-5 for bulls.
I don't trade on waves, it doesn't have the consistency, it's for fun only.

回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-25 04:37 AM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-25 06:43 AM | 显示全部楼层
非常感谢
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-25 07:49 AM | 显示全部楼层
thanks
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-25 10:20 AM | 显示全部楼层
回复 1# 大牛Steve


   
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-25 12:54 PM | 显示全部楼层
Thanks
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-25 01:26 PM | 显示全部楼层
support~
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-7-25 08:15 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|小黑屋|www.hutong9.net

GMT-5, 2025-8-7 05:09 PM , Processed in 0.060037 second(s), 21 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表