找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 2643|回复: 41

很奇怪没人讨论金融改革啊??

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-6-18 10:23 AM | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式


我天天盯着政策看,这里有人讨论么?
发表于 2009-6-18 10:35 AM | 显示全部楼层
1# winwise

Cannot understand the new plan.
xxxx
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-18 11:02 AM | 显示全部楼层
要不老大先抛块儿玉,看有没有砖头?
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-18 11:02 AM | 显示全部楼层
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-18 11:12 AM | 显示全部楼层
我天天盯着政策看,这里有人讨论么?
winwise 发表于 2009-6-18 11:23


感觉是早晚的事.谁让WS这次捅出这么大的漏子呢.具体条文还没看,据说有85页.总的来说,银行应该不太可能象前几年那样大把捞钱了.银行业在未来几年都会是半死不活.
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-18 11:16 AM | 显示全部楼层
只要民主党控制美国经济和政治,什么改革都不如不改!!!
不信走着瞧!!!
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-18 11:59 AM | 显示全部楼层
只要民主党控制美国经济和政治,什么改革都不如不改!!!
不信走着瞧!!!
金牛银熊 发表于 2009-6-18 16:16

哈哈,
我还主要看看欧洲的,政客们讨论的挺火。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-18 12:00 PM | 显示全部楼层
要不老大先抛块儿玉,看有没有砖头?
xiaoxiaozhang 发表于 2009-6-18 16:02

你在等着拍吗?
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-18 12:01 PM | 显示全部楼层
等着看看dividend-growth老大的高见呢。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-18 12:04 PM | 显示全部楼层
老实说,政策改好像仍留下了商品的投机口,也就是说商品上涨》》》...没人管
查HEDGE FUND的人手少了,不知道上海要不要给点政策把人都引过去
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-18 12:07 PM | 显示全部楼层
老实说,政策改好像仍留下了商品的投机口,也就是说商品上涨》》》...没人管
查HEDGE FUND的人手少了,不知道上海要不要给点政策把人都引过去
winwise 发表于 2009-6-18 01:04 PM


就怕没有引进真正的专家,反而来了一帮吃里扒外的,就麻烦了。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-18 12:10 PM | 显示全部楼层
Anyone could analyze the impacts?

June 18 (Bloomberg) -- Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner defended the administration’s proposal to give the Federal Reserve increased powers in his first public tussle with lawmakers skeptical whether the central bank is up to the job.

Advocating for President Barack Obama’s regulatory overhaul on Capitol Hill, the Treasury chief faced repeated questions from senators who cited previous regulatory failures at the Fed and potential conflicts with its monetary-policy duties.

“The Federal Reserve is best positioned” to oversee the biggest financial companies, Geithner told the Senate Banking Committee in Washington, adding that the Obama plan gives the Fed only “modest additional authority.” Most central banks around the world have some responsibility for monitoring systemic risks, he said.

Obama’s plan calls for the Fed to monitor the biggest, most interconnected banks, sets up a new agency to oversee consumer financial products and brings hedge funds and private equity firms under federal supervision for the first time. The central bank, which supervised Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp., has come under fire from some members of Congress for its secretiveness and lack of public accountability.

Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd and the senior Republican on the panel, Richard Shelby, both said they were concerned that the Fed system, with its diffuse structure of district banks, would be ineffective in watching over companies deemed too big to fail.

‘Grossly Inflated’

The administration’s regulatory proposal “represents a grossly inflated view of the Fed’s expertise,” said Shelby, of Alabama.

Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, quoted one critic’s view that giving the central bank more power was like awarding a son a “bigger, faster car right after he crashed the family station wagon.” He added that he hadn’t made a conclusion on the issue.

Geithner said that the Fed has “greater knowledge and feel for broader market developments” than any other U.S. banking agency. He added that giving those powers to a council of regulators wouldn’t work.

“You don’t convene a committee to put out a fire,” he said.

The administration also wants to put an additional check on the Fed’s emergency lending power by requiring the Treasury to approve its use in advance, Geithner told the panel. He also said the new consumer agency will take away Fed authority over mortgages, credit cards and other issues.

Fed Chairman

Senator Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican, asked Geithner if Obama should pledge in writing that none of the administration officials who worked on the regulatory blueprint that increased the Fed’s power will become chairman of the central bank. National Economic Council Director Lawrence Summers, one of the plan’s chief architects, is often mentioned as a possible successor to Ben S. Bernanke, the current Fed chairman.

“No,” Geithner said. “I don’t think that will be appropriate, nor do I think that will be necessary.”

Senator Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat, said he is reluctantly coming to the conclusion that the Fed should serve as the systemic risk overseer even after its failures in protecting consumers.

“You cannot let the perfect be the enemy of the good here, or we end up with less,” Schumer said. “I tend to agree that the Fed is the best answer.”

One Regulator

Schumer separately faulted the administration for not being bolder in its overall plan, and called for considering a single regulator for the nation’s banks. Geithner countered that argument by noting that other countries that have consolidated regulators weren’t immune to the global crisis.

On the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, Geithner said he hasn’t decided whether to end the bailout effort by the end of the year, as the law calls for. The legislation, passed in October, gives the Treasury secretary the option to extend it through most of 2010 by submitting a written justification to Congress.

The Treasury secretary urged lawmakers to accelerate their consideration of the administration’s proposal.

“Every financial crisis of the last generation has sparked some effort at reform, but past efforts have begun too late, after the will to act has subsided,” Geithner said. “We cannot let that happen this time.”

Geithner is also scheduled to testify before the House Financial Services Committee today.

The president’s announcement yesterday marks the beginning of what promises to be a political battle that’s likely to alter the administration plan, with some lawmakers opposing any expansion of the Fed’s power. Obama, who has called the “sweeping overhaul” of regulation one of his top domestic priorities, said he wants to sign legislation by year-end.
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-18 12:12 PM | 显示全部楼层
winwise,看欧元这个架势,是要过1.40呀?
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-18 12:13 PM | 显示全部楼层
玩期货的都必须是土生土长的子弟兵。。。。。。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-18 12:14 PM | 显示全部楼层
Anyone could analyze the impacts?

June 18 (Bloomberg) -- Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner defended the administration’s proposal to give the Federal Reserve increased powers in his first public ...
Amy999 发表于 2009-6-18 17:10


FED是PRIVATE BANK,是CENTRAL BANK, 是MONTERY POLICY MAKER, 现在还是BAD BANK
再加个REGULATER身份,哈哈哈,
总统归它选了
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-18 12:16 PM | 显示全部楼层
winwise,看欧元这个架势,是要过1.40呀?
CoolMax 发表于 2009-6-18 17:12

AH
现在FX的EASY MONEY也会越来越少了。珍惜米米,远离DT。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-18 12:17 PM | 显示全部楼层
winwise,看欧元这个架势,是要过1.40呀?
CoolMax 发表于 2009-6-18 17:12


美元被啊哈一下。 我觉得美元2个月后还有一浪跌。
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-18 12:17 PM | 显示全部楼层
玩期货的都必须是土生土长的子弟兵。。。。。。
金牛银熊 发表于 2009-6-18 17:13

恩啦,这年头血统真是那么一回事
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-18 12:18 PM | 显示全部楼层
FED是PRIVATE BANK,是CENTRAL BANK, 是MONTERY POLICY MAKER, 现在还是BAD BANK
再加个REGULATER身份,哈哈哈,
总统归它选了
winwise 发表于 2009-6-18 01:14 PM


呵呵,美国真正的统治者,不是一直就是这些犹太金融寡头吗,啥时候改变过了?
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-6-18 12:21 PM | 显示全部楼层
就怕美国正在规避的, 这些”人才’到了中国又把它拿出来. 我同意08的这个观点, 即这次金融风暴起因是金融界的贪婪. 他们制造的那些LEVERAGE, 又何尝不知它们的危害.

金融改革在美国困难多多, 因为它是一个标榜自由市场的国家. 这些银行家也不会轻易妥协, 绝大多数的企业和银行是私有的, 如何在追求繁荣和市场监管间找一个平衡是接下来的关健. 我想一个可能的结局是: 政策是政策, 银行界的精英们还是在用他们的方式控制股市, 汇市. 这个世界只要还有想通过投机赚钱的人, 就杜绝不了这类生意.
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|小黑屋|www.hutong9.net

GMT-5, 2025-3-4 04:48 PM , Processed in 0.072282 second(s), 14 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表