找回密码
 注册
搜索
查看: 723|回复: 6

Apple earnings grow in second fiscal quarter (BEAT)

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-4-22 03:30 PM | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式


本帖最后由 foolishhao 于 2009-4-22 16:32 编辑

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) - Apple Inc. reported a surprise gain in net income for its second fiscal quarter as sales for the period came in better than expected. For the quarter ended March 31, Apple (AAPL:Apple Inc
News , chart , profile , more
Last: 121.23-0.53-0.44%

4:00pm 04/22/2009

Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolio
Analyst
Create alert Insider
Discuss
Financials
Sponsored by:
AAPL 121.23, -0.53, -0.4%) reported net income of $1.2 billion, or $1.33 per share, compared to earnings of $1 billion, or $1.16 a share, for the same period the previous year. Sales grew 9% to $8.17 billion for the quarter. Analysts were expecting Apple to report earnings of $1.09 per share on revenue of $8 billion, according to consensus estimates from FactSet Research
发表于 2009-4-22 04:04 PM | 显示全部楼层
same trick, apple always low its prediction first, then beat it.

It is playing the same stuff qtr by qtr.
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-22 04:19 PM | 显示全部楼层
The top line was not impressive.
iPhone is never a major product for AAPL. Now that the Mac business is going down, the excuse for the $120->$150 run last year no longer exists.

Any price spike above $125 would be tradeable.
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-22 04:24 PM | 显示全部楼层
Btw, AAPL's whisper number was $1.36
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-22 05:46 PM | 显示全部楼层
The top line was not impressive.
iPhone is never a major product for AAPL. Now that the Mac business is going down, the excuse for the $120->$150 run last year no longer exists.

Any price spike ab ...
goodness 发表于 2009-4-22 17:19


How is iphone not a major product for AAPL?  As far as I know, it contributed about $1.5 billion to the top line.  And if not for the deferred revenue recognition, where it's realized over a 2 year period, it would've been even more, probably $1 billion more, and this will only snow ball each quarter.  And all this, with iphone out for what, less than 2 years?
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-22 07:31 PM | 显示全部楼层
Gadget is a gadget. iPhone sales would be soon capped in the near future. I have to repeat that iPhone has never been and would never be a product to sustain the growth of whole company as expected.

iMac sales grow, then AAPL hikes.
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-22 08:59 PM | 显示全部楼层
Let's see, ipod and iphone are both gadgets, and they account for more than half the company's revenue.  Apple made its comeback with the iPod, a gadget.  iMac sales are down single digits during the greatest recession since the great depression. Apple has consistent beaten estimates quarter to quarter, they have $29 billion cash.  Give credit where it's due.
回复 鲜花 鸡蛋

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

手机版|小黑屋|www.hutong9.net

GMT-5, 2025-3-1 10:23 AM , Processed in 0.079051 second(s), 14 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表